MaxKellermann commented on pull request #154: URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/154#issuecomment-774619672
> Loom will have to find a solution for it, anyway. I agree with that. I read that OpenJDK link, and my first thought was: this is a bad implementation if it makes `synchronized` so special that it blocks context switches. There's no reason why it would need to, that's just an (unoptimized) implementation detail. If this Loom thing forces everybody to rewrite their code, replacing a simple thing as `synchronized` with more complicated, error-prone code, it's bad. But I can't decide what you want to support, it's not my project here ... ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
