[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-6048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14009815#comment-14009815
 ] 

Michal Mocny commented on CB-6048:
----------------------------------

Thanks for the extra details and isolated tests.

That it is NOT in top-level `config.xml` is expected.
That it is NOT in `platforms/android/res/xml/config.xml` until after a 'build' 
is fine, because it seems you have to run `prepare` after an `update` which 
`build` does automatically.

May you do one more test for me, please?  I'd like to isolate if this is a 
problem only with upgrades from 3.4 or if it isn't working for you ever.  May 
you create a new project with 3.5 and see if the setting applies to your 
`AndroidManifest.xml`, please?

> Add config setting for Android app launchMode
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CB-6048
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-6048
>             Project: Apache Cordova
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Android, CLI
>            Reporter: Michal Mocny
>            Assignee: Michal Mocny
>
> As raised on mailing list: "[Android] Apps restart instead of resume when 
> brought to focus by clicking app icon"
> "TLDR; AndroidManifest.xml <activity> needs: android:launchMode="singleTop" 
> -- can I add it?
> Quick search brings up: 
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10122449/phonegap-android-application-restarting-instead-of-resuming-although-it-was-not
> ..which advises to add android:launchMode="singleTask" to AndroidManifest.xml 
> <activity>, which does fix the issue.
> According to the descriptions in 
> http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/manifest/activity-element.html the 
> differences mostly stem in how the app handles intents, however, there is a 
> comment in the table of descriptions which labels singleTask launchMode as  
> "(not recommended for general use)".
> On the other hand, singleTop mode *is* recommended, and also fixes the issue, 
> and according to the description, sounds to me like a much better default."



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to