[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-11270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15321752#comment-15321752
]
Shazron Abdullah commented on CB-11270:
---------------------------------------
Broadly, <allow-intent> is for: "Controls which URLs the app is allowed to ask
the system to open."
Just on that intent, and for backwards compat., I would say: Yes they should be
allowed.
The problem I had (if I recall) with UIWebViewNavigationTypeOther (any
javascript click) is I couldn't be sure what type of navigation it is, whether
it was user initiated (which UIWebViewNavigationTypeLinkClicked is for sure)
like the second interaction, or programmatically done -- which is another
issue, perhaps security wise (scripts (ads?) could spam the system, for example
open N Safari windows in rapid succession)
But perhaps my concern is too narrow, and that's not the role of this tag --
should we allow every kind of interaction?
> [QUESTION] Is whitelist intent filter working as intended?
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CB-11270
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-11270
> Project: Apache Cordova
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: iOS
> Reporter: Tony Homer
> Assignee: Shazron Abdullah
>
> In 3.8.0, given an intent directive like
> {code}
> <allow-intent href="tel:*" />
> {code}
> , interacting with any of the following elements would result in tel:
> requests that would all be allowed:
> {code}
> <a id="tel-button" href="tel:777777777">do tel with a.href</a>
> <a id="tel-a-onclick" onclick="document.location.href='tel:777777777';">do
> tel with a.onclick</a>
> <button id="tel-button" onclick="document.location.href='tel:777777777';">do
> tel with button.onclick</button>
> {code}
> However, in 4.1.1, only the first interaction will be allowed.
> This is because intent directives are only applied to the
> UIWebViewNavigationTypeLinkClicked navigationType (the navigationType for the
> second and third examples is UIWebViewNavigationTypeOther).
> Is this working as intended?
> It seems that either the whitelist intent filter in 4+ is not working as
> intended or, if working as intended, the documentation should be improved to
> spell out this case.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]