pandaapo commented on code in PR #4543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/eventmesh/pull/4543#discussion_r1384183085
##########
.github/workflows/ci.yml:
##########
@@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ jobs:
# queries: ./path/to/local/query, your-org/your-repo/queries@main
languages: ${{ matrix.language }}
+ - if: matrix.language == 'cpp' || matrix.language == 'csharp'
+ name: Build C
+ run: |
+ make
Review Comment:
> [xwm1992#11](https://github.com/xwm1992/EventMesh/pull/11)
这是我自己仓库的pr修改，显示ci check是通过了的，但是提交到主仓库就失败了
After comparing the CI information of the two repositories, there are still
differences. The former's CodeQL seems to only analyze Java, while the latter
is not. But I am not sure about the specific reason.
---
对比了一下两个仓库的CI信息，还是有差别的。前者的CodeQL好像只分析java的，后者则不是。但具体原因我也不清楚。
##########
.github/workflows/ci.yml:
##########
@@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ jobs:
# queries: ./path/to/local/query, your-org/your-repo/queries@main
languages: ${{ matrix.language }}
+ - if: matrix.language == 'cpp' || matrix.language == 'csharp'
+ name: Build C
+ run: |
+ make
Review Comment:
> [xwm1992#11](https://github.com/xwm1992/EventMesh/pull/11)
这是我自己仓库的pr修改，显示ci check是通过了的，但是提交到主仓库就失败了
After comparing the CI information of the two repositories, there are still
differences. The former's CodeQL seems to only analyze Java, while the latter
is not. But I am not sure about the specific reason.
---
对比了一下两个仓库的CI信息，还是有差别的。前者的CodeQL好像只分析java的，后者则不是。但具体原因我也不清楚。
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
