[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17216029#comment-17216029
 ] 

Michael Vorburger commented on FINERACT-1208:
---------------------------------------------

[~aleks] an alternative could be to have less strict code quality for generated 
code. Whether is this {{-Werror}}, or Checkstyle, or SpotBugs - it's great for 
{{fineract-provider}}, and in a perfect world should cover any hand-written 
code in {{src/}} of {{fineract-client}} as well - but not 
{{fineract-client/build/generated/java}}... quality checking that is not the 
responsibility of the Fineract project (but of the project providing those 
templates) - and there is nothing Fineract can (nor should, IMHO) do if there 
are violations. It will just hinder expanding code quality metrics for our own 
code. Do you see what I mean? Now how to actually do this right in this 
build... is something you will know much better than me! ;)

> -Werror javac compilerArg lost during move to multi modules
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FINERACT-1208
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1208
>             Project: Apache Fineract
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael Vorburger
>            Assignee: Aleksandar Vidakovic
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> While code reviewing https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/1402/ for 
> FINERACT-1189, I've just realized that as part of the overall FINERACT-1171 
> effort to move to multi modules, and refactoring moves in the build scripts, 
> we could be more careful not to introduce regressions.
> Specifically, I've noticed that the {{-Werror}} javac compilerArg introduced 
> in FINERACT-959 was at least temporarily lost again (it's currently commented 
> out with a TODO from the root {{/build.gradle}}, and being removed from 
> {{fineract-provider/build.gradle}}.
> [~aleks] is this regression something you will fix and raise a PR for?
> [~ptuomola] FYI.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to