[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17405849#comment-17405849
]
bharath gowda commented on FINERACT-1393:
-----------------------------------------
[~francisguchie] I feel the account numbers following an incremental series is
ok, as it gives a lot of insights on the loan/savings just by referring to the
account number, and more importantly, I am not sure what could be the downfall
if the account number is predictable, unless there is any security threat which
you have come across?
> Random Account number Generation
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: FINERACT-1393
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1393
> Project: Apache Fineract
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Savings
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 1.1.0, 1.2.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0, 1.5.0
> Reporter: Francis Guchie
> Assignee: Rahul Pawar
> Priority: Major
>
> At the moment Fineract creates account numbers using the Id (primary key
> number) in the table in question. Clients, Savings, Deposits, Shares & Loans
> alike.
> As a user, I would like Fineract to use a random number generator while
> creating the following
> Savings, Deposits, Shares Accounts
> So that the number is not too predictable as it is currently
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
