[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17828308#comment-17828308
]
Adam Saghy commented on FINERACT-2063:
--------------------------------------
[~kigred.developer] Thank you for the clarification.
One more thing i am not up to date. Are we talking about to:
* There is a standing instruction to be executed money transfer at 19 Mar 2024
* Assuming there was not enough money on the savings account, this standing
instruction was not executed
* The very next day enough money was added to the savings account
* Assuming the standing instructions got executed daily
** Should the above standing instruction to be executed again and try to pay
the due installment?
** or
** Should the next standing instruction - which is to be executed at 19 Apr
2024 - should pay the earliest unpaid installment?
So in TLDR my question:
- Should we execute again past, not-completed standing instructions or should
we allow actual standing instruction to pay the earliest unpaid installment?
> Enable repayment of overdue installments
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: FINERACT-2063
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2063
> Project: Apache Fineract
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Loan
> Affects Versions: 1.9.0
> Reporter: Kigenyi Wilfred
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.10.0
>
>
> Currently the standing instruction task will only execute a transfer if the
> loan installment in question is for the exact date as the date on which the
> task is running. This means that if for example a client had an installment
> due for the day before (or several days before), that installment will not be
> settled if the client deposits funds on his savings account today or the next
> day.
> The thinking is that installments should be settled as longs as they are not
> in the future, that is if the are today or they are overdue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
