nidhiii128 commented on PR #17:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/fineract-chat-archive/pull/17#issuecomment-4029182004

   hii @meonkeys,
   
   I want to apologize for taking extra time and for the previous iterations 
that didn't quite meet the requirements. I wanted to be absolutely sure I had 
baselined my local environment correctly and verified the idempotency before 
resubmitting.
   
   I made a few changes , i replaced Instant.now() window start with a 
'snapped' hourly timestamp. This ensures the 4-day window remains identical for 
any run within the same 60-minute block.
   
   Also for the verification i used my slack token, the message i posted on 5th 
march using my own Slack token, I confirmed the tool correctly fetches/excludes 
messages based on the window. I verified that a message from March 5th was 
correctly included when LOOKBACK_DAYS was set to 6 and excluded when set to 4, 
but since the actual slack token counts messages in seconds i couldnt verify 
that.
   
   Verification on my changes when i ran git status no unnecessary changes were 
made to the archived HTML files. which  prevent the 24-hour 'jump' that occurs 
when a script runs across a UTC day-boundary, ensuring no messages (like those 
from March 6th) are dropped due to time drift.
   
   please review by ur side and let me know if i need to know more on this.
   
   Thank you for your patience and for the guidance on this fix!
   
   and on your message  "" I'm guessing that will self-resolve. But maybe 
LOOKBACK_DAYS in the scheduled run should be 2, or even 3? What do you think? 
"" i am not sure abt this i made those changes, and if those changes are also 
creating the same problem then i think this would be the next reason of failing 
or unnecessary deleting of message.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to