elnafateh commented on PR #5674: URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/5674#issuecomment-4466439887
@adamsaghy thanks, this helps alot. Now from my understanding the community have agreed that enforcing deterministic fallback idempotency by default could introduce risks. The discussion helped clarify that the stronger direction is likely: 1. keeping idempotency as an explicit client-server contract 2. improving observability when keys are missing [ already a working progress - #5798 ] 3. potentially exploring configurable enforcement mechanisms rather than server-side inference [ optional ] Now I intended to move this PR to aligned with Optional Configuration, Would this direction make more sense architecturally? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
