adamsaghy commented on PR #6017: URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/6017#issuecomment-4874532611
> > Hi @vidakovic and @adamsaghy, > > Thank you for bringing up this historical context! That is a very valid point regarding the relevance of the MIX XBRL standards. > > I have already created the Jira ticket ([FINERACT-2670](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2670)) and set up a local JAXB object graph branch based on our earlier discussion, but I am more than happy to pause the implementation here. > > If the consensus is that the module is obsolete and removing it entirely is the better architectural direction for Fineract, I would be glad to pivot this ticket/PR toward safely deprecating and removing the `fineract-mix` module instead! > > I'll hold off until you decide on the best path forward for the codebase. > > Any Update @vidakovic and @adamsaghy ? From my perspective, if you want to enhance your code and utilize DTOs and annotations instead of manually building and serializing XML, I’m perfectly fine with that. Regarding the removal, that’s not something we’ll decide here. You should raise this question on the Fineract DEV email list instead. However, these are two separate issues. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
