[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14374890#comment-14374890
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1655:
---------------------------------------
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/508#issuecomment-84592099
I personally don't like the sound of all these class names too much. It
seems to be too redundant and too long in most cases. I know the ...Invokables
weren't so much better either but at least they were short.
Let us think about this for a little before making these changes.
> Rename StreamInvokable to StreamOperator
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-1655
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1655
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Streaming
> Reporter: Gyula Fora
> Assignee: Akshay Dixit
> Priority: Minor
>
> The names of the StreamInvokable and ChainableInvokable are misleading and is
> easy to confuse with the AbstractInvokable
> These classes ( and the variable names that refer to objects) should be
> renamed to:
> StreamInvokable -> StreamOperator
> ChainableInvokable -> ChainableStreamOperator
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
