[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15988920#comment-15988920
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6337:
---------------------------------------
Github user zhijiangW commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3785#discussion_r113945018
--- Diff:
flink-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/test/misc/SuccessAfterNetworkBuffersFailureITCase.java
---
@@ -68,7 +68,6 @@ public void testSuccessfulProgramAfterFailure() {
try {
runKMeans(cluster.getLeaderRPCPort());
- fail("This program execution should have
failed.");
--- End diff --
Yes, I misunderstand this test and you get the key point.
> Remove the buffer provider from PartitionRequestServerHandler
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-6337
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6337
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Network
> Reporter: zhijiang
> Assignee: zhijiang
> Priority: Minor
>
> Currently, {{PartitionRequestServerHandler}} will create a
> {{LocalBufferPool}} when the channel is registered. The {{LocalBufferPool}}
> is only used to get segment size for creating read view in
> {{SpillableSubpartition}}, and the buffers in the pool will not be used all
> the time, so it will waste the buffer resource of global pool.
> We would like to remove the {{LocalBufferPool}} from the
> {{PartitionRequestServerHandler}}, and the {{LocalBufferPool}} in
> {{ResultPartition}} can also provide the segment size for creating sub
> partition view.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
