[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15993342#comment-15993342
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6364:
---------------------------------------
Github user StefanRRichter commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3801#discussion_r114321075
--- Diff:
flink-contrib/flink-statebackend-rocksdb/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/contrib/streaming/state/RocksDBKeyedStateBackend.java
---
@@ -152,6 +179,10 @@ public RocksDBKeyedStateBackend(
) throws IOException {
super(kvStateRegistry, keySerializer, userCodeClassLoader,
numberOfKeyGroups, keyGroupRange, executionConfig);
+
+ this.jobId = jobId;
--- End diff --
We could introduce preconditon checks against `null`.
> Implement incremental checkpointing in RocksDBStateBackend
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-6364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6364
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
> Reporter: Xiaogang Shi
> Assignee: Xiaogang Shi
>
> {{RocksDBStateBackend}} is well suited for incremental checkpointing because
> RocksDB is base on LSM trees, which record updates in new sst files and all
> sst files are immutable. By only materializing those new sst files, we can
> significantly improve the performance of checkpointing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
