[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16092769#comment-16092769
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7174:
---------------------------------------

Github user tzulitai commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4321#discussion_r128180555
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-connectors/flink-connector-kafka-0.9/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kafka/internal/KafkaConsumerThread.java
 ---
    @@ -335,6 +356,9 @@ public void setOffsetsToCommit(Map<TopicPartition, 
OffsetAndMetadata> offsetsToC
         */
        @VisibleForTesting
        void reassignPartitions(List<KafkaTopicPartitionState<TopicPartition>> 
newPartitions) throws Exception {
    +           if (newPartitions.size() > 0) {
    +                   hasAssignedPartitions = true;
    +           }
    --- End diff --
    
    Should we actually extend this `if` block to wrap the whole code in 
`reassignPartitions`? I.e., we shouldn't be doing the reassignment logic if 
`newPartitions.size() == 0`.


> Bump dependency of Kafka 0.10.x to the latest one
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-7174
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7174
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Kafka Connector
>            Reporter: Piotr Nowojski
>            Assignee: Piotr Nowojski
>
> We are using pretty old Kafka version for 0.10. Besides any bug fixes and 
> improvements that were made between 0.10.0.1 and 0.10.2.1, it 0.10.2.1 
> version is more similar to 0.11.0.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to