[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16114196#comment-16114196
]
Xingcan Cui commented on FLINK-7337:
------------------------------------
Hi [~fhueske], sorry for the silly questions.
In my mind, to convert a DataStream to a Table, the timestamps and watermarks
must be assigned in advance with an assigner. Then (1) what's the relationship
between the timestamps assigned before and those set by the new
{{ProcessFunction}}, and (2) could the timestamps dynamically set to the
{{StreamRecord}} work without the watermarks?
> Refactor handling of time indicator attributes
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-7337
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7337
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Table API & SQL
> Affects Versions: 1.4.0
> Reporter: Fabian Hueske
> Assignee: Fabian Hueske
>
> After a [discussion on the dev mailing
> list|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/735d55f9022df8ff73566a9f1553e14be94f8443986ad46559b35869@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E]
> I propose the following changes to the current handling of time indicator
> attributes:
> * Remove the separation of logical and physical row type.
> ** Hold the event-time timestamp as regular Long field in Row
> ** Represent the processing-time indicator type as a null-valued field in Row
> (1 bit overhead)
> * Remove materialization of event-time timestamps because timestamp is
> already accessible in Row.
> * Add {{ProcessFunction}} to set timestamp into the timestamp field of a
> {{StreamRecord}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
