[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16117047#comment-16117047
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7337:
---------------------------------------
Github user twalthr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4488#discussion_r131708789
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -245,14 +244,18 @@ abstract class CodeGenerator(
returnType: TypeInformation[_ <: Any],
resultFieldNames: Seq[String])
: GeneratedExpression = {
- val input1AccessExprs = input1Mapping.map { idx =>
- generateInputAccess(input1, input1Term, idx)
+ val input1AccessExprs = input1Mapping.map {
+ case -1 => generateStreamRecordTimestampAcccess()
+ case -2 =>
generateNullLiteral(TimeIndicatorTypeInfo.PROCTIME_INDICATOR)
+ case idx => generateInputAccess(input1, input1Term, idx)
}
val input2AccessExprs = input2 match {
case Some(ti) =>
- input2Mapping.map { idx =>
- generateInputAccess(ti, input2Term, idx)
+ input2Mapping.map {
--- End diff --
are there any use case where these lines are needed?
> Refactor handling of time indicator attributes
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-7337
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7337
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Table API & SQL
> Affects Versions: 1.4.0
> Reporter: Fabian Hueske
> Assignee: Fabian Hueske
>
> After a [discussion on the dev mailing
> list|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/735d55f9022df8ff73566a9f1553e14be94f8443986ad46559b35869@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E]
> I propose the following changes to the current handling of time indicator
> attributes:
> * Remove the separation of logical and physical row type.
> ** Hold the event-time timestamp as regular Long field in Row
> ** Represent the processing-time indicator type as a null-valued field in Row
> (1 bit overhead)
> * Remove materialization of event-time timestamps because timestamp is
> already accessible in Row.
> * Add {{ProcessFunction}} to set timestamp into the timestamp field of a
> {{StreamRecord}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)