[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16261075#comment-16261075
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7499:
---------------------------------------

Github user NicoK commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4581#discussion_r152342364
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/io/disk/iomanager/AsynchronousBufferFileWriter.java
 ---
    @@ -31,9 +31,26 @@ protected AsynchronousBufferFileWriter(ID channelID, 
RequestQueue<WriteRequest>
                super(channelID, requestQueue, CALLBACK, true);
        }
     
    +   /**
    +    * Writes the given block asynchronously.
    +    *
    +    * @param buffer
    +    *              the buffer to be written (will be recycled when done)
    --- End diff --
    
    good catch, but actually, `SpillableSubpartition` doesn't do any recycling 
itself: in its `finish()` method, it relies on the buffer being on-heap and 
then garbage-collected, for the `add()` function, it relies on the caller, i.e. 
`ResultPartition#add()` (which I also forgot to adapt).


> double buffer release in SpillableSubpartitionView
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-7499
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7499
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Network
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0, 1.1.4, 1.3.0, 1.1.5, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.3.1, 1.4.0, 
> 1.3.2, 1.3.3
>            Reporter: Nico Kruber
>            Assignee: Nico Kruber
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> {{SpillableSubpartitionView#releaseMemory()}} recycles its buffers twice: 
> once asynchronously after the write operation and once in 
> {{SpillableSubpartitionView#releaseMemory()}} after adding the write 
> operation to the queue.
> 1) if {{SpillableSubpartitionView#releaseMemory()}} hits first and the buffer 
> is recycled, the memory region may already be reused despite the pending write
> 2) If, for some reason (probably only in tests like 
> {{SpillableSubpartitionTest#testConsumeSpillablePartitionSpilledDuringConsume()}}?),
>  the buffer is retained and to be used in parallel somewhere else it may also 
> not be available anymore or contain corrupt data.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to