[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16261077#comment-16261077
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7499:
---------------------------------------

Github user NicoK commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4581#discussion_r152342531
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/io/network/partition/SpillableSubpartitionView.java
 ---
    @@ -108,11 +108,7 @@ int releaseMemory() throws IOException {
                                for (int i = 0; i < numBuffers; i++) {
                                        Buffer buffer = buffers.remove();
                                        spilledBytes += buffer.getSize();
    -                                   try {
    -                                           spillWriter.writeBlock(buffer);
    -                                   } finally {
    -                                           buffer.recycle();
    -                                   }
    +                                   spillWriter.writeBlock(buffer);
    --- End diff --
    
    Actually, if I see this correctly, here the original code is wrong since it 
is already recycling a buffer which was added to an asynchronous file write 
operation. This would lead to data corruption if the buffer is re-used in the 
meanwhile, wouldn't it?!


> double buffer release in SpillableSubpartitionView
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-7499
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7499
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Network
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0, 1.1.4, 1.3.0, 1.1.5, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.3.1, 1.4.0, 
> 1.3.2, 1.3.3
>            Reporter: Nico Kruber
>            Assignee: Nico Kruber
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> {{SpillableSubpartitionView#releaseMemory()}} recycles its buffers twice: 
> once asynchronously after the write operation and once in 
> {{SpillableSubpartitionView#releaseMemory()}} after adding the write 
> operation to the queue.
> 1) if {{SpillableSubpartitionView#releaseMemory()}} hits first and the buffer 
> is recycled, the memory region may already be reused despite the pending write
> 2) If, for some reason (probably only in tests like 
> {{SpillableSubpartitionTest#testConsumeSpillablePartitionSpilledDuringConsume()}}?),
>  the buffer is retained and to be used in parallel somewhere else it may also 
> not be available anymore or contain corrupt data.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to