[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16322299#comment-16322299
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8360:
---------------------------------------

Github user pnowojski commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5239#discussion_r160948522
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/state/TestTaskStateManager.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.flink.runtime.state;
    +
    +import org.apache.flink.api.common.JobID;
    +import org.apache.flink.core.testutils.OneShotLatch;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.CheckpointMetaData;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.CheckpointMetrics;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.OperatorSubtaskState;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.TaskStateSnapshot;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionAttemptID;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.jobgraph.OperatorID;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.CheckpointResponder;
    +
    +import javax.annotation.Nonnull;
    +import javax.annotation.Nullable;
    +
    +import java.util.HashMap;
    +import java.util.Map;
    +
    +/**
    + * Implementation of {@link TaskStateManager} for tests.
    + */
    +public class TestTaskStateManager implements TaskStateManager {
    +
    +   private long reportedCheckpointId;
    +
    +   private JobID jobId;
    +   private ExecutionAttemptID executionAttemptID;
    +
    +   private final Map<Long, TaskStateSnapshot> 
taskStateSnapshotsByCheckpointId;
    +   private CheckpointResponder checkpointResponder;
    +   private OneShotLatch waitForReportLatch;
    +
    +   public TestTaskStateManager() {
    +           this(null, null, null);
    --- End diff --
    
    Does this constructor necessary have to have those nulls?  Can not those 
values be properly initialised?
    
    By the way. Isn't this the symptom of a my previous remark that 
`TaskStateManager` should be decomposed into two/three separate entities? 


> Implement task-local state recovery
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-8360
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8360
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
>            Reporter: Stefan Richter
>            Assignee: Stefan Richter
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> This issue tracks the development of recovery from task-local state. The main 
> idea is to have a secondary, local copy of the checkpointed state, while 
> there is still a primary copy in DFS that we report to the checkpoint 
> coordinator.
> Recovery can attempt to restore from the secondary local copy, if available, 
> to save network bandwidth. This requires that the assignment from tasks to 
> slots is as sticky is possible.
> For starters, we will implement this feature for all managed keyed states and 
> can easily enhance it to all other state types (e.g. operator state) later.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to