[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16322296#comment-16322296
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8360:
---------------------------------------
Github user pnowojski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5239#discussion_r160941763
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/taskexecutor/TaskExecutorTest.java
---
@@ -210,10 +211,11 @@ public void testHeartbeatTimeoutWithJobManager()
throws Exception {
tmConfig,
taskManagerLocation,
mock(MemoryManager.class),
- mock(IOManager.class),
+
mock(IOManager.class),mock(TaskExecutorLocalStateStoresManager.class),
--- End diff --
Can all of the `mock(TaskExecutorLocalStateStoresManager.class)` be
replaced with: `new TaskExecutorLocalStateStoresManager();` (with an empty
array of for `localStateRootDirectories`) or maybe `new
TaskExecutorLocalStateStoresManager(sameThreadExecutor());`?
> Implement task-local state recovery
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-8360
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8360
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
> Reporter: Stefan Richter
> Assignee: Stefan Richter
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> This issue tracks the development of recovery from task-local state. The main
> idea is to have a secondary, local copy of the checkpointed state, while
> there is still a primary copy in DFS that we report to the checkpoint
> coordinator.
> Recovery can attempt to restore from the secondary local copy, if available,
> to save network bandwidth. This requires that the assignment from tasks to
> slots is as sticky is possible.
> For starters, we will implement this feature for all managed keyed states and
> can easily enhance it to all other state types (e.g. operator state) later.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
