Github user NicoK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4552#discussion_r161576253
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/taskmanager/TaskCancelAsyncProducerConsumerITCase.java
---
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ public void testCancelAsyncProducerAndConsumer() throws
Exception {
config.setInteger(ConfigConstants.LOCAL_NUMBER_TASK_MANAGER, 1);
config.setInteger(ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NUM_TASK_SLOTS, 1);
config.setInteger(TaskManagerOptions.MEMORY_SEGMENT_SIZE, 4096);
-
config.setInteger(TaskManagerOptions.NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS, 8);
+
config.setInteger(TaskManagerOptions.NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS, 16);
--- End diff --
just a note for the curious: this test can cope with higher number of
network buffers and is waiting for all of them to be blocked - increasing this
to `9` would have been enough here though (we require 2 exclusive buffers now
per default, while 1 was the minimum per incoming channel)
---