[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16376798#comment-16376798 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8689: --------------------------------------- Github user hequn8128 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5555#discussion_r170577731 --- Diff: flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/runtime/aggregate/AggregateUtil.scala --- @@ -1393,6 +1393,21 @@ object AggregateUtil { throw new TableException(s"unsupported Function: '${unSupported.getName}'") } } + + // create distinct accumulator delegate + if (aggregateCall.isDistinct) { --- End diff -- It is better to move this logic into the upper match. Distinct is also a kind of aggregate whose fields should not be empty. Also, we can reuse some variables. What do you think? > Add runtime support of distinct filter using MapView > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FLINK-8689 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8689 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Rong Rong > Assignee: Rong Rong > Priority: Major > > This ticket should cover distinct aggregate function support to codegen for > *AggregateCall*, where *isDistinct* fields is set to true. > This can be verified using the following SQL, which is not currently > producing correct results. > {code:java} > SELECT > a, > SUM(b) OVER (PARTITION BY a ORDER BY proctime ROWS BETWEEN 5 PRECEDING AND > CURRENT ROW) > FROM > MyTable{code} > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)