[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16376931#comment-16376931
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8689:
---------------------------------------
Github user walterddr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5555#discussion_r170604304
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/runtime/aggregate/AggregateUtil.scala
---
@@ -1393,6 +1393,21 @@ object AggregateUtil {
throw new TableException(s"unsupported Function:
'${unSupported.getName}'")
}
}
+
+ // create distinct accumulator delegate
+ if (aggregateCall.isDistinct) {
--- End diff --
Good point. Actually there's a very interesting question I've been thinking
- This AggFunction literally is the distinct version of the
`CollectAggFunction`, however it cannot exist by itself unless chained with
other `realAgg` functions --> this means we will need to chain
`DistinctAggFunction` with `CollectAggFunction` which just dont make sense. I
will try some other approach and see if they work.
> Add runtime support of distinct filter using MapView
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-8689
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8689
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Rong Rong
> Assignee: Rong Rong
> Priority: Major
>
> This ticket should cover distinct aggregate function support to codegen for
> *AggregateCall*, where *isDistinct* fields is set to true.
> This can be verified using the following SQL, which is not currently
> producing correct results.
> {code:java}
> SELECT
> a,
> SUM(b) OVER (PARTITION BY a ORDER BY proctime ROWS BETWEEN 5 PRECEDING AND
> CURRENT ROW)
> FROM
> MyTable{code}
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
