[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16476252#comment-16476252
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8944:
---------------------------------------

Github user tweise commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5992#discussion_r188378324
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-connectors/flink-connector-kinesis/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kinesis/config/ConsumerConfigConstants.java
 ---
    @@ -65,14 +65,14 @@ public SentinelSequenceNumber 
toSentinelSequenceNumber() {
        /** The date format of initial timestamp to start reading Kinesis 
stream from (when AT_TIMESTAMP is set for STREAM_INITIAL_POSITION). */
        public static final String STREAM_TIMESTAMP_DATE_FORMAT = 
"flink.stream.initpos.timestamp.format";
     
    -   /** The base backoff time between each describeStream attempt. */
    -   public static final String STREAM_DESCRIBE_BACKOFF_BASE = 
"flink.stream.describe.backoff.base";
    --- End diff --
    
    I think that this should be one unit of work.


> Use ListShards for shard discovery in the flink kinesis connector
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-8944
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8944
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Kailash Hassan Dayanand
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently the DescribeStream AWS API used to get list of shards is has a 
> restricted rate limits on AWS. (5 requests per sec per account). This is 
> problematic when running multiple flink jobs all on same account since each 
> subtasks calls the Describe Stream. Changing this to ListShards will provide 
> more flexibility on rate limits as ListShards has a 100 requests per second 
> per data stream limits.
> More details on the mailing list. https://goo.gl/mRXjKh



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to