Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
    Hmm...there is another reason, indeed the mainly performance overhead is 
the `seek()`. Even though we use the `deleteRange()` to implement this, we also 
need to get the last key of the entries which means we also need to iterate all 
the entries. So, the `deleteRange()` approach seems won't make a obvious lift 
then this approach.


Reply via email to