[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16487264#comment-16487264
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9386:
---------------------------------------

Github user uce commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6031#discussion_r190214988
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/rest/handler/router/RouterHandler.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.flink.runtime.rest.handler.router;
    +
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.rest.handler.AbstractRestHandler;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.rest.handler.util.HandlerUtils;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.rest.messages.ErrorResponseBody;
    +
    +import org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.channel.ChannelHandler;
    +import 
org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.channel.ChannelHandlerContext;
    +import 
org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.channel.ChannelInboundHandler;
    +import org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.channel.ChannelPipeline;
    +import 
org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.channel.SimpleChannelInboundHandler;
    +import 
org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.handler.codec.http.DefaultFullHttpResponse;
    +import 
org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpHeaders;
    +import 
org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpMethod;
    +import 
org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpRequest;
    +import 
org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpResponseStatus;
    +import 
org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpVersion;
    +import 
org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.handler.codec.http.QueryStringDecoder;
    +
    +import java.util.Map;
    +
    +import static java.util.Objects.requireNonNull;
    +
    +/**
    + * This class replaces the standard error response to be identical with 
those sent by the {@link AbstractRestHandler}.
    + */
    +public class RouterHandler extends 
SimpleChannelInboundHandler<HttpRequest> {
    +   public static final String ROUTER_HANDLER_NAME = 
RouterHandler.class.getName() + "_ROUTER_HANDLER";
    +   public static final String ROUTED_HANDLER_NAME = 
RouterHandler.class.getName() + "_ROUTED_HANDLER";
    +
    +   private final Map<String, String> responseHeaders;
    +   private final Router router;
    +
    +   public RouterHandler(Router router, final Map<String, String> 
responseHeaders) {
    +           this.router = requireNonNull(router);
    +           this.responseHeaders = requireNonNull(responseHeaders);
    +   }
    +
    +   public String getName() {
    +           return ROUTER_HANDLER_NAME;
    +   }
    +
    +   @Override
    +   protected void channelRead0(ChannelHandlerContext 
channelHandlerContext, HttpRequest httpRequest) throws Exception {
    +           if (HttpHeaders.is100ContinueExpected(httpRequest)) {
    +                   channelHandlerContext.writeAndFlush(new 
DefaultFullHttpResponse(HttpVersion.HTTP_1_1, HttpResponseStatus.CONTINUE));
    +                   return;
    +           }
    +
    +           // Route
    +           HttpMethod method = httpRequest.getMethod();
    +           QueryStringDecoder qsd = new 
QueryStringDecoder(httpRequest.getUri());
    +           RouteResult routeResult = router.route(method, qsd.path(), 
qsd.parameters());
    +
    +           if (routeResult == null) {
    +                   respondNotFound(channelHandlerContext, httpRequest);
    +                   return;
    +           }
    +
    +           routed(channelHandlerContext, routeResult, httpRequest);
    +   }
    +
    +   private void routed(
    +                   ChannelHandlerContext channelHandlerContext,
    +                   RouteResult routeResult,
    +                   HttpRequest httpRequest) throws Exception {
    +           ChannelInboundHandler handler = (ChannelInboundHandler) 
routeResult.target();
    +
    +           // The handler may have been added (keep alive)
    +           ChannelPipeline pipeline     = channelHandlerContext.pipeline();
    +           ChannelHandler addedHandler = pipeline.get(ROUTED_HANDLER_NAME);
    +           if (handler != addedHandler) {
    +                   if (addedHandler == null) {
    +                           pipeline.addAfter(ROUTER_HANDLER_NAME, 
ROUTED_HANDLER_NAME, handler);
    +                   } else {
    +                           pipeline.replace(addedHandler, 
ROUTED_HANDLER_NAME, handler);
    +                   }
    +           }
    +
    +           channelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(new 
RoutedRequest(routeResult, httpRequest).retain());
    --- End diff --
    
    Do you think it makes sense to move `new RoutedRequest(routeResult, 
httpRequest).retain()` to a separate line? I was wondering whether it is 
retained as in the original handler, because I missed the `retain()` here.
    
    I find the following clearer, but feel free to ignore:
    
    ```java
    RoutedRequest request = new RoutedRequest(routeResult, httpRequest);
    request.retain();
    channelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(request);
    ```


> Remove netty-router dependency
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-9386
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9386
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Piotr Nowojski
>            Assignee: Piotr Nowojski
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>
> netty-router 1.10 blocks upgrade to 4.1, while netty-router 2.2.0 has broken 
> compatibility in a way that it's unusable by us (it doesn't allow to sort 
> router paths as in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8000 ). I 
> propose to copy & simplify & modify netty-router code to suite our needs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to