[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16495048#comment-16495048
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9423:
---------------------------------------

Github user StefanRRichter commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6062#discussion_r191732576
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-streaming-java/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/operators/InternalTimerHeapTest.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,470 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators;
    +
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.state.KeyGroupRange;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.state.VoidNamespace;
    +import org.apache.flink.util.Preconditions;
    +
    +import org.junit.Assert;
    +import org.junit.Test;
    +
    +import java.util.ArrayList;
    +import java.util.Collections;
    +import java.util.HashSet;
    +import java.util.Iterator;
    +import java.util.List;
    +import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
    +import java.util.Set;
    +import java.util.concurrent.ThreadLocalRandom;
    +import java.util.function.BiFunction;
    +import java.util.function.Function;
    +
    +/**
    + * Tests for {@link InternalTimerHeap}.
    + */
    +public class InternalTimerHeapTest {
    +
    +   private static final KeyGroupRange KEY_GROUP_RANGE = new 
KeyGroupRange(0, 1);
    +
    +   private static void insertRandomTimers(
    +           InternalTimerHeap<Integer, VoidNamespace> timerPriorityQueue,
    +           int count) {
    +           insertRandomTimers(timerPriorityQueue, null, count);
    +   }
    +
    +   private static void insertRandomTimers(
    +           InternalTimerHeap<Integer, VoidNamespace> timerPriorityQueue,
    +           Set<TimerHeapInternalTimer<Integer, VoidNamespace>> checkSet,
    +           int count) {
    +
    +           ThreadLocalRandom localRandom = ThreadLocalRandom.current();
    +
    +           for (int i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
    +                   TimerHeapInternalTimer<Integer, VoidNamespace> timer =
    +                           new 
TimerHeapInternalTimer<>(localRandom.nextLong(), i, VoidNamespace.INSTANCE);
    +                   if (checkSet != null) {
    +                           Preconditions.checkState(checkSet.add(timer));
    +                   }
    +                   Assert.assertTrue(timerPriorityQueue.add(timer));
    +           }
    +   }
    +
    +   private static InternalTimerHeap<Integer, VoidNamespace> 
newPriorityQueue(int initialCapacity) {
    +           return new InternalTimerHeap<>(
    +                   initialCapacity,
    +                   KEY_GROUP_RANGE,
    +                   KEY_GROUP_RANGE.getNumberOfKeyGroups());
    +   }
    +
    +   @Test
    +   public void testCombined() {
    +           final int initialCapacity = 4;
    +           final int testSize = 1000;
    +           InternalTimerHeap<Integer, VoidNamespace> timerPriorityQueue = 
newPriorityQueue(initialCapacity);
    +           HashSet<TimerHeapInternalTimer<Integer, VoidNamespace>> 
checkSet = new HashSet<>(testSize);
    +
    +           insertRandomTimers(timerPriorityQueue, checkSet, testSize);
    +
    +           long lastTimestamp = Long.MIN_VALUE;
    +           int lastSize = timerPriorityQueue.size();
    +           Assert.assertEquals(testSize, lastSize);
    +           TimerHeapInternalTimer<Integer, VoidNamespace> timer;
    +           while ((timer = timerPriorityQueue.peek()) != null) {
    +                   Assert.assertFalse(timerPriorityQueue.isEmpty());
    +                   Assert.assertEquals(lastSize, 
timerPriorityQueue.size());
    +                   Assert.assertEquals(timer, timerPriorityQueue.poll());
    +                   Assert.assertTrue(checkSet.remove(timer));
    +                   Assert.assertTrue(timer.getTimestamp() >= 
lastTimestamp);
    +                   lastTimestamp = timer.getTimestamp();
    +                   --lastSize;
    +           }
    +
    +           Assert.assertTrue(timerPriorityQueue.isEmpty());
    +           Assert.assertEquals(0, timerPriorityQueue.size());
    +           Assert.assertEquals(0, checkSet.size());
    +   }
    +
    +   @Test
    +   public void testAdd() {
    +           testAddOfferCommon(InternalTimerHeap<Integer, 
VoidNamespace>::add);
    +   }
    +
    +   @Test
    +   public void testOffer() {
    +           testAddOfferCommon(InternalTimerHeap<Integer, 
VoidNamespace>::offer);
    --- End diff --
    
    The difference is as defined in the queue interface, but for the tested 
class they are equal because there is no capacity limit.


> Implement efficient deletes for heap based timer service
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-9423
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9423
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Streaming
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0
>            Reporter: Stefan Richter
>            Assignee: Stefan Richter
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>
> The current data structures in the `HeapInternalTimerService` are not able to 
> support efficient timer deletes, the complexity is currently O\(n\), where n 
> is the number of registered timers.
>  
> We can keep track of timer's positions in the priority queue and (in 
> combination with the already existing set/map) have a more efficient 
> algorithm for deletes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to