[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16539930#comment-16539930
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9784:
---------------------------------------
Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6298
+1, from my side
> Inconsistent use of 'static' in AsyncIOExample.java
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-9784
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9784
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Examples
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0, 1.4.2
> Reporter: Alexei Nekrassov
> Assignee: Alexei Nekrassov
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> In SampleAsyncFunction having _executorService_ and _random_ as static, but
> _counter_ as instance-specific will not work when someone creates a second
> instance of SampleAsyncFunction. In second SampleAsyncFunction the _counter_
> will be 0 and we will re-intialize static _executorService_ and _random_,
> thus interfering with the first SampleAsyncFunction object.
> To fix this example and make it clearer, make _executorService_ and _random_
> instance-specific. That will make _counter_ redundant; also synchronization
> on class will no longer be needed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)