[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14653295#comment-14653295
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2472:
---------------------------------------
Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/979#discussion_r36168637
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/client/JobClientActor.java
---
@@ -167,4 +275,10 @@ private void logAndPrintMessage(Object message) {
System.out.println(message.toString());
}
}
+
+ private void resetContextAndActor(){
+ this.currentJobCreatedAt = -1;
+ this.currentJobId = null;
+ getContext().setReceiveTimeout(FiniteDuration.Inf());
--- End diff --
According to the docs, you should pass `Duration.Undefined` to turn off the
receive timeout message.
> Make the JobClientActor check periodically if the submitted Job is still
> running and if the JobManager is still alive
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-2472
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2472
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Till Rohrmann
> Assignee: Sachin Goel
>
> In case that the {{JobManager}} dies without notifying possibly connected
> {{JobClientActors}} or if the job execution finishes without sending the
> {{SerializedJobExecutionResult}} back to the {{JobClientActor}}, it might
> happen that a {{JobClient.submitJobAndWait}} never returns.
> I propose to let the {{JobClientActor}} periodically check whether the
> {{JobManager}} is still alive and whether the submitted job is still running.
> If not, then the {{JobClientActor}} should return an exception to complete
> the waiting future.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
