NicoK commented on a change in pull request #6692: [FLINK-10331][network] 
reduce unnecesary flushing
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6692#discussion_r218357947
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/io/network/partition/PipelinedSubpartition.java
 ##########
 @@ -279,6 +281,21 @@ public int unsynchronizedGetNumberOfQueuedBuffers() {
                return Math.max(buffers.size(), 0);
        }
 
+       @Override
+       public void flush() {
+               synchronized (buffers) {
+                       if (buffers.isEmpty()) {
+                               return;
+                       }
+                       if (!flushRequested) {
+                               flushRequested = true; // set this before the 
notification!
+                               if (buffers.size() == 1) {
 
 Review comment:
   sure - I think, I explained the flushing behaviour in the class' JavaDoc
   > Whenever {@link #add(BufferConsumer)} adds a finished {@link 
BufferConsumer} or a second {@link BufferConsumer} (in which case we will 
assume the first one finished), we will {@link 
PipelinedSubpartitionView#notifyDataAvailable() notify} a read view created via 
{@link #createReadView(BufferAvailabilityListener)} of new data availability. 
Except by calling {@link #flush()} explicitly, we always only notify when the 
first finished buffer turns up and then, the reader has to drain the buffers 
via {@link #pollBuffer()} until its return value shows no more buffers being 
available.
   
   But it doesn't hurt to have something small / more explicit here as well
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to