[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16641512#comment-16641512
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10386:
----------------------------------------

tillrohrmann commented on issue #6729: [FLINK-10386] [taskmanager] Remove 
legacy class TaskExecutionStateListener
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6729#issuecomment-427755128
 
 
   Thanks for the clarification @TisonKun. I'll give it another pass with your 
comments in mind.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


> Remove legacy class TaskExecutionStateListener
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-10386
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10386
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: TaskManager
>    Affects Versions: 1.7.0
>            Reporter: tison
>            Assignee: tison
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> After a discussion 
> [here|https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/0735b5b935b0c0757943e2d58047afcfb9949560#commitcomment-30584257]
>  with [[email protected]]. I start to analyze the usage of 
> {{ActorGatewayTaskExecutionStateListener}} and {{TaskExecutionStateListener}}.
> In conclusion, we abort {{TaskExecutionStateListener}} strategy and no any 
> component rely on it. Instead, we introduce {{TaskManagerActions}} to take 
> the role for the communication of {{Task}} with {{TaskManager}}. No one 
> except {{TaskManager}} should directly communicate with {{Task}}. So it can 
> be safely remove legacy class {{TaskExecutionStateListener}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to