[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14723153#comment-14723153
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2525:
---------------------------------------

Github user mjsax commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1046#issuecomment-136289777
  
    This is the stack trace (occurs in 4/5 runs -- the other run failed before 
due to unrelated test). It seems you broke something.
    ```
    Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 5.149 sec 
<<< FAILURE! - in 
org.apache.flink.stormcompatibility.exclamation.ExclamationWithStormSpoutITCase
    
testJobWithoutObjectReuse(org.apache.flink.stormcompatibility.exclamation.ExclamationWithStormSpoutITCase)
  Time elapsed: 3.825 sec  <<< FAILURE!
    java.lang.AssertionError: Error while calling the test program: Job 
execution failed.
        at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
        at 
org.apache.flink.streaming.util.StreamingProgramTestBase.testJobWithoutObjectReuse(StreamingProgramTestBase.java:102)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
        at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
        at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
        at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
        at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
        at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
        at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:264)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:124)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:200)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:153)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
    ```
    I will review after you fixed it.


> Add configuration support in Storm-compatibility
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-2525
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2525
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Storm Compatibility
>            Reporter: fangfengbin
>            Assignee: fangfengbin
>
> Spouts and Bolt are initialized by a call to `Spout.open(...)` and 
> `Bolt.prepare()`, respectively. Both methods have a config `Map` as first 
> parameter. This map is currently not populated. Thus, Spouts and Bolts cannot 
> be configure with user defined parameters. In order to support this feature, 
> spout and bolt wrapper classes need to be extended to create a proper `Map` 
> object. Furthermore, the clients need to be extended to take a `Map`, 
> translate it into a Flink `Configuration` that is forwarded to the wrappers 
> for proper initialization of the map.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to