zhijiangW commented on a change in pull request #8090: [FLINK-12067][network]
Refactor the constructor of NetworkEnvironment
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/8090#discussion_r273318302
##########
File path:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/taskmanager/NetworkEnvironmentConfiguration.java
##########
@@ -105,6 +106,302 @@ public NettyConfig nettyConfig() {
return nettyConfig;
}
+ public boolean isCreditBased() {
+ return isCreditBased;
+ }
+
+ //
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+ /**
+ * Utility method to extract network related parameters from the
configuration and to
+ * sanity check them.
+ *
+ * @param configuration configuration object
+ * @param maxJvmHeapMemory the maximum JVM heap size (in bytes)
+ * @param localTaskManagerCommunication true, to skip initializing the
network stack
+ * @param taskManagerAddress identifying the IP address under which the
TaskManager will be accessible
+ * @return NetworkEnvironmentConfiguration
+ */
+ @Deprecated
+ public static NetworkEnvironmentConfiguration fromConfiguration(
+ Configuration configuration,
+ long maxJvmHeapMemory,
+ boolean localTaskManagerCommunication,
+ InetAddress taskManagerAddress) {
+
+ // ----> hosts / ports for communication and data exchange
+
+ final int dataport =
configuration.getInteger(TaskManagerOptions.DATA_PORT);
+ ConfigurationParserUtils.checkConfigParameter(dataport >= 0,
dataport, TaskManagerOptions.DATA_PORT.key(),
+ "Leave config parameter empty or use 0 to let the
system choose a port automatically.");
+
+ final int pageSize =
ConfigurationParserUtils.getPageSize(configuration);
+
+ final int numNetworkBuffers;
+ if (!hasNewNetworkConfig(configuration)) {
+ // fallback: number of network buffers
+ numNetworkBuffers =
configuration.getInteger(TaskManagerOptions.NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS);
+
+ checkOldNetworkConfig(numNetworkBuffers);
+ } else {
+ if
(configuration.contains(TaskManagerOptions.NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS)) {
+ LOG.info("Ignoring old (but still present)
network buffer configuration via {}.",
+
TaskManagerOptions.NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS.key());
+ }
+
+ final long networkMemorySize =
calculateNewNetworkBufferMemory(configuration, maxJvmHeapMemory);
+
+ // tolerate offcuts between intended and allocated
memory due to segmentation (will be available to the user-space memory)
+ long numNetworkBuffersLong = networkMemorySize /
pageSize;
+ if (numNetworkBuffersLong > Integer.MAX_VALUE) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("The given
number of memory bytes (" + networkMemorySize
+ + ") corresponds to more than MAX_INT
pages.");
+ }
+ numNetworkBuffers = (int) numNetworkBuffersLong;
+ }
+
+ final NettyConfig nettyConfig;
+ if (!localTaskManagerCommunication) {
+ final InetSocketAddress taskManagerInetSocketAddress =
new InetSocketAddress(taskManagerAddress, dataport);
+
+ nettyConfig = new
NettyConfig(taskManagerInetSocketAddress.getAddress(),
taskManagerInetSocketAddress.getPort(),
+ pageSize,
ConfigurationParserUtils.getSlot(configuration), configuration);
+ } else {
+ nettyConfig = null;
+ }
+
+ int initialRequestBackoff =
configuration.getInteger(TaskManagerOptions.NETWORK_REQUEST_BACKOFF_INITIAL);
+ int maxRequestBackoff =
configuration.getInteger(TaskManagerOptions.NETWORK_REQUEST_BACKOFF_MAX);
+
+ int buffersPerChannel =
configuration.getInteger(TaskManagerOptions.NETWORK_BUFFERS_PER_CHANNEL);
+ int extraBuffersPerGate =
configuration.getInteger(TaskManagerOptions.NETWORK_EXTRA_BUFFERS_PER_GATE);
+
+ boolean isCreditBased =
configuration.getBoolean(TaskManagerOptions.NETWORK_CREDIT_MODEL);
Review comment:
After thinking through this issue again, if we keep maintaining
`isCreditBased` in `NetworkEnvironmentConfiguration`, we have to confirm this
property consistent between `NetworkEnvironmentConfiguration` and Flink
`Configuration` in `NettyConfig`. So the codes seem ugly in
`NetworkEnvironmentConfigurationBuilder`. Then atm I would prefer to add this
property in the constructor of `NettyConnectionManager` even though we would
remove this deprecated option future.
I have submitted the fixup commit for this issue. :)
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services
