sunhaibotb commented on a change in pull request #8124: [FLINK-11877] Implement
the runtime handling of the InputSelectable interface
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/8124#discussion_r275251339
##########
File path:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/io/network/partition/consumer/UnionInputGate.java
##########
@@ -197,22 +217,23 @@ public void requestPartitions() throws IOException,
InterruptedException {
return Optional.of(bufferOrEvent);
}
- @Override
- public Optional<BufferOrEvent> pollNextBufferOrEvent() throws
UnsupportedOperationException {
- throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
- }
-
- private InputGateWithData waitAndGetNextInputGate() throws IOException,
InterruptedException {
+ private InputGateWithData waitAndGetNextInputGate(boolean blocking)
throws IOException, InterruptedException {
Review comment:
Try running the benchmark of `StreamNetwork*` and the results of each run
are quite different, so it is difficult to measure the performance impact of
`Optional`. According to my previous use, returning `Optional` in `public
Optional<StreamElement> NetworkInput#pollNextElement()` has a performance
penalty, because `Optional.of()` would new object. But that is per-record, and
the impact should be negligible for per-buffer, so I think that returning
`Optional <...>` is all right.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services
