[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14744399#comment-14744399 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2525: --------------------------------------- Github user fhueske commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1046#issuecomment-140222747 Actually, I think going through the `TaskConfig` as proposed by @mjsax is the cleaner way. Going through the system-internal `JobConfiguration` and exposing it to user programs is not a good choice, in my opinion. The purpose of `TaskConfig` is exactly to give parameters to a task (function, spout). Also the `StreamingRuntimeContext` would not need to be adapted, because it already offers a method `getTaskStubParameters()`. Would that work as well or are there major issues preventing you from using the `TaskConfig`? > Add configuration support in Storm-compatibility > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: FLINK-2525 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2525 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Storm Compatibility > Reporter: fangfengbin > Assignee: fangfengbin > > Spouts and Bolt are initialized by a call to `Spout.open(...)` and > `Bolt.prepare()`, respectively. Both methods have a config `Map` as first > parameter. This map is currently not populated. Thus, Spouts and Bolts cannot > be configure with user defined parameters. In order to support this feature, > spout and bolt wrapper classes need to be extended to create a proper `Map` > object. Furthermore, the clients need to be extended to take a `Map`, > translate it into a Flink `Configuration` that is forwarded to the wrappers > for proper initialization of the map. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)