[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14744911#comment-14744911
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2525:
---------------------------------------
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1046#issuecomment-140291773
As per discussion on the dev list, the `ExecuionConfig` has the
`GlobalJobParameters`, which are useful if one type of config is used across
all operators.
If each of the operators needs its own config, can you create an abstract
base class for the storm functions which takes a configuration as an argumen?
BTW: There is no plan to remove the `withParameters()` method in the batch
API. It is just not the encouraged mechanism any more...
> Add configuration support in Storm-compatibility
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-2525
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2525
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Storm Compatibility
> Reporter: fangfengbin
> Assignee: fangfengbin
>
> Spouts and Bolt are initialized by a call to `Spout.open(...)` and
> `Bolt.prepare()`, respectively. Both methods have a config `Map` as first
> parameter. This map is currently not populated. Thus, Spouts and Bolts cannot
> be configure with user defined parameters. In order to support this feature,
> spout and bolt wrapper classes need to be extended to create a proper `Map`
> object. Furthermore, the clients need to be extended to take a `Map`,
> translate it into a Flink `Configuration` that is forwarded to the wrappers
> for proper initialization of the map.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
