Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1141#issuecomment-142956414
Yes the reason why I introduced the `CommonCSVInputFormat` instead of
unifying it with the `GenericCsvInputFormat` was that we still have the Record
API `CsvInputFormat` in the code base. It doesn't need the pojo type
information and, thus, I thought that it does not make sense to let it inherit
from a class which has these fields. Actually, I would be in favour of removing
the Record API's `CsvInputFormat` if possible. Moreover, I would like to more
cleanly separate the tuple type `CsvInputFormat` and the pojo type
`CsvInputFormat`, because the pojo support was kind of hacked into the original
`CsvInputFormat`. Also the way the input format is set up, is imho a little bit
clumsy and error-prone (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2692).
But this has no high priority.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
