[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17008929#comment-17008929
]
Gary Yao edited comment on FLINK-14163 at 1/6/20 2:58 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------
Since there is no issue when using the NettyShuffleMaster (the only
implementation), I do not see immediate call for action in 1.10. I would
welcome it, if we can simplify the
{{ShuffleMaster#registerPartitionWithProducer()}} interface but this is for
[~zjwang] and [~azagrebin] to decide.
was (Author: gjy):
Since there is no issue when using the NettyShuffleMaster (the only
implementation), I do not see immediate call for action in 1.10. I would
welcome it, if we can simplify the
{{ShuffleMaster#registerPartitionWithProducer()} interface but this is for
[~zjwang] and [~azagrebin] to decide.
> Execution#producedPartitions is possibly not assigned when used
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-14163
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14163
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Runtime / Coordination
> Affects Versions: 1.9.0, 1.10.0
> Reporter: Zhu Zhu
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.10.0
>
>
> Currently {{Execution#producedPartitions}} is assigned after the partitions
> have completed the registration to shuffle master in
> {{Execution#registerProducedPartitions(...)}}.
> The partition registration is an async interface
> ({{ShuffleMaster#registerPartitionWithProducer(...)}}), so
> {{Execution#producedPartitions}} is possible[1] not set when used.
> Usages includes:
> 1. deploying this task, so that the task may be deployed without its result
> partitions assigned, and the job would hang. (DefaultScheduler issue only,
> since legacy scheduler handled this case)
> 2. generating input descriptors for downstream tasks:
> 3. retrieve {{ResultPartitionID}} for partition releasing:
> [1] If a user uses Flink default shuffle master {{NettyShuffleMaster}}, it is
> not problematic at the moment since it returns a completed future on
> registration, so that it would be a synchronized process. However, if users
> implement their own shuffle service in which the
> {{ShuffleMaster#registerPartitionWithProducer}} returns an pending future, it
> can be a problem. This is possible since customizable shuffle service is open
> to users since 1.9 (via config "shuffle-service-factory.class").
> To avoid issues to happen, we may either
> 1. fix all the usages of {{Execution#producedPartitions}} regarding the async
> assigning, or
> 2. change {{ShuffleMaster#registerPartitionWithProducer(...)}} to a sync
> interface
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
