tillrohrmann commented on a change in pull request #11353: [FLINK-16438][yarn] 
Make YarnResourceManager starts workers using WorkerResourceSpec requested by 
SlotManager
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/11353#discussion_r403090988
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-kubernetes/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/kubernetes/KubernetesResourceManager.java
 ##########
 @@ -232,57 +229,75 @@ private void recoverWorkerNodesFromPreviousAttempts() 
throws ResourceManagerExce
                        ++currentMaxAttemptId);
        }
 
-       private void requestKubernetesPod() {
-               numPendingPodRequests++;
+       private void requestKubernetesPod(WorkerResourceSpec 
workerResourceSpec) {
+               final KubernetesTaskManagerParameters parameters =
+                       
createKubernetesTaskManagerParameters(workerResourceSpec);
+
+               podWorkerResources.put(parameters.getPodName(), 
workerResourceSpec);
+               final int pendingWorkerNum = 
pendingWorkerCounter.increaseAndGet(workerResourceSpec);
 
                log.info("Requesting new TaskManager pod with <{},{}>. Number 
pending requests {}.",
-                       defaultMemoryMB,
-                       defaultCpus,
-                       numPendingPodRequests);
+                       parameters.getTaskManagerMemoryMB(),
+                       parameters.getTaskManagerCPU(),
+                       pendingWorkerNum);
+               log.info("TaskManager {} will be started with {}.", 
parameters.getPodName(), workerResourceSpec);
+
+               final KubernetesPod taskManagerPod =
+                       
KubernetesTaskManagerFactory.createTaskManagerComponent(parameters);
+               kubeClient.createTaskManagerPod(taskManagerPod);
+       }
+
+       private KubernetesTaskManagerParameters 
createKubernetesTaskManagerParameters(WorkerResourceSpec workerResourceSpec) {
+               // TODO: need to unset process/flink memory size from 
configuration if dynamic worker resource is activated
+               final TaskExecutorProcessSpec taskExecutorProcessSpec =
+                       
TaskExecutorProcessUtils.processSpecFromWorkerResourceSpec(flinkConfig, 
workerResourceSpec);
 
                final String podName = String.format(
                        TASK_MANAGER_POD_FORMAT,
                        clusterId,
                        currentMaxAttemptId,
                        ++currentMaxPodId);
 
+               final ContaineredTaskManagerParameters taskManagerParameters =
+                       ContaineredTaskManagerParameters.create(flinkConfig, 
taskExecutorProcessSpec);
+
                final String dynamicProperties =
                        
BootstrapTools.getDynamicPropertiesAsString(flinkClientConfig, flinkConfig);
 
-               final KubernetesTaskManagerParameters 
kubernetesTaskManagerParameters = new KubernetesTaskManagerParameters(
+               return new KubernetesTaskManagerParameters(
                        flinkConfig,
                        podName,
                        dynamicProperties,
                        taskManagerParameters);
-
-               final KubernetesPod taskManagerPod =
-                       
KubernetesTaskManagerFactory.createTaskManagerComponent(kubernetesTaskManagerParameters);
-
-               log.info("TaskManager {} will be started with {}.", podName, 
taskExecutorProcessSpec);
-               kubeClient.createTaskManagerPod(taskManagerPod);
        }
 
        /**
         * Request new pod if pending pods cannot satisfy pending slot requests.
         */
-       private void requestKubernetesPodIfRequired() {
-               final int requiredTaskManagers = 
getNumberRequiredTaskManagers();
+       private void requestKubernetesPodIfRequired(WorkerResourceSpec 
workerResourceSpec) {
+               final int requiredTaskManagers = 
getPendingWorkerNums().get(workerResourceSpec);
+               final int pendingWorkerNum = 
pendingWorkerCounter.getNum(workerResourceSpec);
 
-               if (requiredTaskManagers > numPendingPodRequests) {
-                       requestKubernetesPod();
+               if (requiredTaskManagers > pendingWorkerNum) {
+                       requestKubernetesPod(workerResourceSpec);
                }
        }
 
        private void removePodIfTerminated(KubernetesPod pod) {
                if (pod.isTerminated()) {
                        kubeClient.stopPod(pod.getName());
-                       final KubernetesWorkerNode kubernetesWorkerNode = 
workerNodes.remove(new ResourceID(pod.getName()));
-                       if (kubernetesWorkerNode != null) {
-                               requestKubernetesPodIfRequired();
+                       final WorkerResourceSpec workerResourceSpec = 
removeWorkerNodeAndResourceSpec(new ResourceID(pod.getName()));
+                       if (workerResourceSpec != null) {
+                               
requestKubernetesPodIfRequired(workerResourceSpec);
                        }
                }
        }
 
+       private WorkerResourceSpec removeWorkerNodeAndResourceSpec(ResourceID 
resourceId) {
 
 Review comment:
   Nit: Changing the return type to `Optional<WorkerResourceSpec>` could make 
the contract of this method a bit more explicit.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to