[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17085527#comment-17085527
 ] 

Dawid Wysakowicz edited comment on FLINK-17200 at 4/17/20, 8:09 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Whenever suggesting a new connector (or any new connector/bigger feature) you 
should first reach out to the dev mailling list (see 
https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html)

{quote}
The following types of changes require a [DISCUSS] thread on the [email protected] 
Flink mailing list:

   *  big changes (major new feature; big refactorings, involving multiple 
components)
   * potentially controversial changes or issues
   * changes with very unclear approaches or multiple equal approaches
{quote}

Moreover there were some discussions of encouraging Flink users to host and 
maintain connectors outside the main project and provide a visibility for those 
through https://flink-packages.org/ (I'd say they were inconclusive). 
Personally I am in favor of that approach.

So to answer your question I'd say we can not separate the flink-connectors 
component in JIRA, as it lists only the connectors community agreed to support. 


was (Author: dawidwys):
Whenever suggesting a new connector (or any new connector/bigger feature) you 
should first reach out to the dev mailling list (see 
https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html)

??The following types of changes require a [DISCUSS] thread on the 
[email protected] Flink mailing list:

   *  big changes (major new feature; big refactorings, involving multiple 
components)
   * potentially controversial changes or issues
   * changes with very unclear approaches or multiple equal approaches??

Moreover there were some discussions of encouraging Flink users to host and 
maintain connectors outside the main project and provide a visibility for those 
through https://flink-packages.org/ (I'd say they were inconclusive). 
Personally I am in favor of that approach.

So to answer your question I'd say we can not separate the flink-connectors 
component in JIRA, as it lists only the connectors community agreed to support. 

> Add connectors to ClickHouse
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-17200
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17200
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: jinhai
>            Priority: Major
>
> Clickhouse is a powerful OLAP query engine and supports real-time data mini 
> batch writing.
> We can add flink connectors to ClickHouse
> [weisite: https://clickhouse.tech/|https://clickhouse.tech/]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to