curcur commented on a change in pull request #12269:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/12269#discussion_r429016185
##########
File path:
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/checkpoint/CheckpointCoordinatorTest.java
##########
@@ -262,6 +251,40 @@ public void failJobDueToTaskFailure(Throwable cause,
ExecutionAttemptID failingT
}
}
+ @Test
+ public void testExpiredCheckpointExceedsTolerableFailureNumber() {
+ // create some mock Execution vertices that receive the
checkpoint trigger messages
+ ExecutionVertex vertex1 = mockExecutionVertex(new
ExecutionAttemptID());
+ ExecutionVertex vertex2 = mockExecutionVertex(new
ExecutionAttemptID());
+
+ final String errorMsg = "Exceeded checkpoint failure tolerance
number!";
+ CheckpointFailureManager checkpointFailureManager =
getCheckpointFailureManager(errorMsg);
+ CheckpointCoordinator coord = getCheckpointCoordinator(new
JobID(), vertex1, vertex2, checkpointFailureManager);
+
+ try {
+ // trigger the checkpoint. this should succeed
+ final CompletableFuture<CompletedCheckpoint>
checkPointFuture = coord.triggerCheckpoint(false);
+ manuallyTriggeredScheduledExecutor.triggerAll();
+
assertFalse(checkPointFuture.isCompletedExceptionally());
+
+ coord.abortPendingCheckpoints(new
CheckpointException(CHECKPOINT_EXPIRED));
+
+ fail("Test failed.");
+ }
+ catch (Exception e) {
+ //expected
+ assertTrue(e instanceof RuntimeException);
+ assertEquals(errorMsg, e.getMessage());
Review comment:
Hmm, I think different people have quite different tastes :-)
I am doing it so because the rest of the tests are using the
`try-catch-fail` style. But I am fine with either way.
Do you insist on this? I can make the change if you do :-)
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
