curcur commented on a change in pull request #13175:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13175#discussion_r473929844
##########
File path:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/checkpoint/CompletedCheckpoint.java
##########
@@ -320,6 +320,12 @@ void setDiscardCallback(@Nullable
CompletedCheckpointStats.DiscardCallback disca
@Override
public String toString() {
- return String.format("Checkpoint %d @ %d for %s", checkpointID,
timestamp, job);
+ return String.format(
+ "%s %d @ %d for %s located at %s",
+ props.getCheckpointType(),
Review comment:
I do not have a strong opinion on this as well. But since you ask, let
me have a try LOL :-)
The only concern is that we "might" have more types in the future
1. checkpoint or savepoint; 2. Synchronous or not; 3. Global or Individual;
4. unaligned or not (I mean it could be);
- It is a bit difficult to categorize the enum of CheckpointType to just
"Checkpoint" and "Savepoint"
- It is also difficult to tell what level of technicality a user needs. For
a user that makes an SYNC_SAVEPOINT, he/she probably has enough knowledge to
understand what an SYNC_SAVEPOINT is. Or in other words, if we think
SYNC_SAVEPOINT is not that understandable, we probably need to improve its
expressiveness.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
