Github user uce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1633#discussion_r52997375
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManager.scala
---
@@ -1073,57 +1073,73 @@ class JobManager(
// execute the recovery/writing the jobGraph into the
SubmittedJobGraphStore asynchronously
// because it is a blocking operation
future {
- try {
- if (isRecovery) {
- executionGraph.restoreLatestCheckpointedState()
- }
- else {
- val snapshotSettings = jobGraph.getSnapshotSettings
- if (snapshotSettings != null) {
- val savepointPath = snapshotSettings.getSavepointPath()
+ val restoreStateSuccess =
+ try {
+ if (isRecovery) {
+ executionGraph.restoreLatestCheckpointedState()
--- End diff --
But then I would not keep the behaviour as it is right now. Instead, we
should then consider the job submitted before trying to recover any checkpoint
state and keep the restart behaviour. What do you think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
