godfreyhe opened a new pull request #14637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14637


   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   *Separate the implementation of sink nodes, including StreamExecSink, 
BatchExecSink, StreamExecLegacySink, BatchExecLegacySink*
   
   
   ## Brief change log
   
     - *Introduce StreamPhysicalSink, and make StreamExecSink only extended 
from ExecNode*
     - *Introduce BatchPhysicalSink, and make BatchExecSink only extended from 
ExecNode*
     - *Introduce StreamPhysicalLegacySink, and make StreamExecLegacySink only 
extended from ExecNode*
     - *Introduce BatchPhysicalLegacySink, and make BatchExecLegacySink only 
extended from ExecNode*
     - *BatchCommonSubGraphBasedOptimizer should also consider Sink node*
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   This change is a refactoring rework covered by existing tests.
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / **no**)
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: (yes / **no**)
     - The serializers: (yes / **no** / don't know)
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / **no** 
/ don't know)
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (yes / **no** / 
don't know)
     - The S3 file system connector: (yes / **no** / don't know)
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / **no**)
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs 
/ **not documented**)
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to