[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17306185#comment-17306185
]
Piotr Nowojski commented on FLINK-21467:
----------------------------------------
Could you rephrase what do you mean [~kezhuw]? Or describe the step by step the
problematic scenario? I'm afraid I don't quite follow what's your concern.
{quote}
1. Will "MAX_WATERMARK" be persisted in unaligned checkpoint ?
{quote}
watermarks are not persisted on operator's state. They can be however persisted
as in-flight data by unaligned checkpoint, along side all of the other
{{StreamElement}}s (records, watermarks, latency markers, stream status) as far
as I remember.
> Document possible recommended usage of Bounded{One/Multi}Input.endInput and
> emphasize that they could be called multiple times
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-21467
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21467
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: API / DataStream
> Affects Versions: 1.13.0
> Reporter: Kezhu Wang
> Priority: Major
>
> It is too tempting to use these api, especially {{BoundedOneInput.endInput}},
> to commit final result before FLIP-147 delivered. And this will cause
> re-commit after failover as [~gaoyunhaii] has pointed out in FLINK-21132.
> I have
> [pointed|https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/2033#issuecomment-784153620]
> this out in
> [apache/iceberg#2033|https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/2033], please
> correct me if I was wrong.
> cc [~aljoscha] [~pnowojski] [~roman_khachatryan]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
