Github user tzulitai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1911#discussion_r60759925
--- Diff:
flink-streaming-connectors/flink-connector-kinesis/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kinesis/model/KinesisStreamShard.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.flink.streaming.connectors.kinesis.model;
+
+import java.io.Serializable;
+
+import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
+
+/**
+ * A serializable representation of a AWS Kinesis Stream shard. It is
basically a wrapper class around the information
+ * provided along with {@link com.amazonaws.services.kinesis.model.Shard},
with some extra utility methods to
+ * determine whether or not a shard is closed and whether or not the shard
is a result of parent shard splits or merges.
+ */
+public class KinesisStreamShard implements Serializable {
--- End diff --
The main reason for why the consumer needs to have another Shard
representation is because `com.amazonaws.services.kinesis.model.Shard` doesn't
have the shard's associated stream name as a field. We will need the stream
name when getting a shard iterator for a particular shard, using
`com.amazonaws.services.kinesis.AmazonKinesisClient#getShardIterator(streamName,
shardId, iteratorType)`. Moreover, since the consumer's implementation
supports reading from multiple Kinesis streams, we must carry the associated
stream name along with each Shard representation (I guess that's the reason why
Amazon's Shard implementation doesn't have a field for stream name).
Our implementation,
`org.apache.flink.streaming.connectors.kinesis.model.KinesisStreamShard`,
currently has `regionName` (I don't think we need this actually, since the
consumer is limited to read from Kinesis streams within the same region) and
`streamName` as fields besides the already supplied ones in Amazon's Shard. So,
what we could do to reduce duplicate implementation is to include Amazon's
Shard implementation as a field within our `KinesisStreamShard`, and let the
`KinesisStreamShard` still have `streamName` as an extra field. How do you
think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---