[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15262521#comment-15262521
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3277:
---------------------------------------
Github user vasia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1671#issuecomment-215494415
But was the difference you saw because of the different logic of the
algorithm or because of using Value types? I was under the impression that the
algorithm was quite different.
> Use Value types in Gelly API
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-3277
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3277
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Gelly
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: Greg Hogan
> Assignee: Greg Hogan
>
> This would be a breaking change so the discussion needs to happen before the
> 1.0.0 release.
> I think it would benefit Flink to use {{Value}} types wherever possible. The
> {{Graph}} functions {{inDegrees}}, {{outDegrees}}, and {{getDegrees}} each
> return {{DataSet<Tuple2<K, Long>>}}. Using {{Long}} creates a new heap object
> for every serialization and deserialization. The mutable {{Value}} types do
> not suffer from this issue when object reuse is enabled.
> I lean towards a preference for conciseness in documentation and performance
> in examples and APIs.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
