[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-18295:
-----------------------------------
      Labels: auto-deprioritized-major auto-unassigned  (was: auto-unassigned 
stale-major)
    Priority: Minor  (was: Major)

This issue was labeled "stale-major" 7 ago and has not received any updates so 
it is being deprioritized. If this ticket is actually Major, please raise the 
priority and ask a committer to assign you the issue or revive the public 
discussion.


> Remove the hack logics of result consumers
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-18295
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18295
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Technical Debt
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>            Reporter: Zhu Zhu
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, auto-unassigned
>
> Currently an {{IntermediateDataSet}} can have multiple {{JobVertex}} as its 
> consumers. That's why the consumers of a `IntermediateResultPartition` is in 
> the form of {{List<List<ExecutionEdge>>}}.
> However, in scheduler/{{ExecutionGraph}} there is assumption that one 
> `IntermediateResultPartition` can be consumed by one only 
> `ExecutionJobVertex`. This results in a lot of hack logics which assumes 
> partition consumers to contain a single list.
> We should remove these hack logics. The idea is to change 
> `IntermediateResultPartition#consumers` to be `List<ExecutionEdge>`. 
> `ExecutionGraph` building logics should be adjusted accordingly with the 
> assumption that an `IntermediateResult` can have one only consumer vertex. In 
> `JobGraph`, there should also be check logics for this assumption.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to