dawidwys commented on a change in pull request #15055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15055#discussion_r659741252
##########
File path:
flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/runtime/tasks/StreamTask.java
##########
@@ -695,6 +697,27 @@ protected void afterInvoke() throws Exception {
// close all operators in a chain effect way
operatorChain.closeOperators(actionExecutor);
+ // If checkpoints are enabled, waits for all the records get processed
by the downstream
+ // tasks. During this process, this task could coordinate with its
downstream tasks to
+ // continue perform checkpoints.
+ if (configuration.isCheckpointingEnabled()) {
+ LOG.debug("Waiting for all the records processed by the downstream
tasks.");
+ CompletableFuture<Void> combineFuture =
+ FutureUtils.waitForAll(
+ Arrays.stream(getEnvironment().getAllWriters())
+ .map(
+ FunctionUtils.uncheckedFunction(
+ ResultPartitionWriter
+
::getAllRecordsProcessedFuture))
+ .collect(Collectors.toList()));
+
+ MailboxExecutor mailboxExecutor =
+
mailboxProcessor.getMailboxExecutor(TaskMailbox.MIN_PRIORITY);
+ while (!combineFuture.isDone()) {
Review comment:
Ah right, I forgot/missed the outer loop. Yes, that would be one option.
I don't like the sleep here, but I probably a better solution than busy
looping. Not sure about the value of the sleep/wait. Maybe we could correlate
it with the checkpoint interval? Still would like to hear from @pnowojski what
he thinks about it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
