[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17411013#comment-17411013
]
Arvid Heise commented on FLINK-24182:
-------------------------------------
Thank you. Actually
{noformat}
interrupt shouldn’t be expected in the clean cancellation case
{noformat}
is contradicting my observation. If so, then this should be rather treated as a
bug. In any case, interruptions should be expected after _some_ time.
> Tasks canceler should not immediately interrupt
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-24182
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24182
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Runtime / Task
> Reporter: Arvid Heise
> Priority: Major
>
> While debugging resource leaks (FLINK-24131), I found that any connector is
> immediately interrupted on cancel. Hence, any attempts of using blocking
> calls in {{close}} to cleanup resources are immediately unreliable (e.g.
> aborting transactions).
> It would be nice if tasks get a grace period (e.g.
> task.cancellation.interval) where they can try to free resources in a proper,
> potentially blocking fashion before being interrupted.
> Nevertheless, connectors should always expect interruptions during shutdown,
> in particular when the user-configurable grace period is depleted. I'd add
> that to the connector documentation in a separate effort.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
